Of a Boy – Sonya Hartnett (2003)

I don’t seem to have read that much Australian literature, so thought I would get this one, a novella that was shortlisted for 2003 Man Booker Prize (as it was called then), and also the winner of the Miles Franklin Award. And this read was a corker!

Written from the POV of a nine-year old boy who is living with his grandmother (a reluctant caregiver) and his layabout but kind uncle Rory, this gives the reader an inside look at how Adrian sees the world: he is worried about quicksand and spontaneous combustion, he only has one friend (and this is a bit shakey), he knows that his parents didn’t really want him, and the world is spinning uncontrollably and confusingly around him.

What makes things even more unstable for Adrian is that three young children from his town go missing and the media are full of their story for weeks. And it is this unexplainable disappearance that worries Adrian the most – if it could happen to those children, it could happen to him. And if his parents don’t want him and his grandma is not that enthusiastic, who would look for him?

I really just wanted to squeeze little Adrian and say life gets easier for the most part. But he’s a character in a novella and so, as the reader, you are forced to sit there, watching him worry about things that nine-year olds shouldn’t really be worrying about.

Hartnett really did a good job of bringing Adrian’s thoughts to the fore in this story. I could really understand why Adrian felt the way that he did and did some of the choices that he did because if I had had his life experiences, perhaps I would have done the same. His wary development of some neighborhood friends is nerve-wracking – I so wanted things to work out well for him.

And then, the ending! Wow. I certainly didn’t see that coming. It was an excellent and shocking finish to the story and I am still thinking about it hours after I finished reading it. A very good read.

The Best American Travel Writing 2000 – editor: Bill Bryson

Quote

The early debut edition of the best-selling “America’s
Best…” Series, this volume of writing travels the world from being kidnapped in Uganda to searching for the next in line to the Dalai Llama to hitch-hiking in Cuba to delivering water in Northern Australia. The selection, chosen by Bill Bryson (who I usually adore) covered the gamut from serious to funny (but nothing
completely hilarious like Peter Hessler’s writing in a later edition). Most of the writing was from 1999 (since this was published in 2000), and was from mostly magazines (although a blog would pop up every now and then).

One thing that struck me was that 90% of the authors were male which I found a bit irritating. What? You could only find three articles penned by women that were considered worthy? Really??

But apart from that, the writing was strong and the articles were enjoyable. It’s highly unlikely that I would ever get to travel to Tibet as one of the writers did, or risk my life to stay the night in Central Park (as another person did). But I did get to experience quite closely through the first-person writing of these essays (or articles?).  As the introduction by series editor Jason Wilson writes:

 “Having a travel writer report on particular things, small things, the specific ways in which people act and interact, is perhaps our best way of getting beyond the clichés that we tell each other about different places and cultures, and about ourselves.”

A very fun way to get exposed to different experiences in different cultures and ideal for the armchair traveler. Also excellent for the slight ADD inherent in traveling by plane – good for picking up and putting down; long enough to suck you in, short enough to provide breaks to look out of the window. 🙂

(I bought this secondhand.)

My Brilliant Career – Miles Franklin (1901)

An Australian coming of age classic, My Brilliant Career was written when the author was just 16. It wasn’t a serious effort, but it became published leading to some problems for the young writer as readers perceived the book to be very autobiographical and since some of the characters weren’t particularly nice people, she received a lot of grief from this, and would not allow it to be published again until after her death.

It’s from the PoV of the protagonist Sybylla, a headstrong teenager who lives in the Outback with her family on a farm. Her father’s fortunes tend to rise and fall (mostly fall) related to his drinking, and so she is resigned to staying on the farm in the very limited capacity of young women at the end of the nineteenth century. However, she is extremely passionate about living her “brilliant career” as a writer, but cannot see a way to do it living with the social mores of the day. Young women had very few career options, especially in the bush, and so she was expected to find a relatively well-off
man and marry him and live the life of a Victorian-era Australian society woman.

This dichotomy between what she feels the world expects her to be, and what she herself wants to be, is the central motif throughout the story – she feels very isolated feeling, as she does, that she does not want to marry and live that life in a gilded cage.

Her mother despairs of her, and so Grandma asks her to come and live with her and her aunt for a long while. This is a wonderful avenue to freedom for Sybylla as it exposes her to culture, to music, to people who read more than the stock reports. While there, she meets and reluctantly falls in love with an eligible neighbor and she cannot believe that she could be loved by someone so wonderful. So, in the end, she feels that she has to choose: does she want to marry and live the life expected of her? Or does she want to be a writer? Sybylla does not see these as compatible and so it is an either/or situation.

Love’s trials are, of course, up and down, and at the end of the book, she makes her decision, but is it the right one?

I really wanted to sit Sybylla down and chat with her, as it turned out that her suitor understood her creative urge and would have given a writing life to her. However, she had made her mind up that marriage and writing were two unrelated things, and to have one meant that you could not have the other.  You can see the author’s immaturity in how the protagonist views life in very black and white terms when, obviously, if she had just listened to what was being offered, it would have been ok.

This was quite a good read in the end.  I enjoyed the journal aspect of the book, and am impressed at the age of the author when she wrote it. I can also empathize with her neighbors at being annoyed at how they were portrayed! I am not too sure why it’s such a classic apart from the fact that she has a very strong female protagonist at a time when women were to be seen and not heard – perhaps it is due to this early feminist angle?

Her life goes on to prove this feminist bent when she came to the US to work for the National Women’s Trade Union League of America in Chicago, and then later moved to England to work for another non-profit group. However, she herself did not get her “brilliant literary career” until she was in 50’s and returned to Australia. The Miles Franklin Prize was established later.

This was a Virago edition and I have had it in the TBR pile for ages – at least 20-something years. My mum bought it over when she visited one summer.